Global Plastic Policy Reviews

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

When referring to any of the results of our analysis and/or its concept and design, please cite us accordingly:
Global Plastics Policy Centre (2022) March A., Salam, S., Evans, T., Hilton, J., Fletcher, S. (editors). Global Plastics Policy Review. Revolution Plastics Institute, University of Portsmouth.

Singapore Environmental Protection and Management Act 1999 (Revised in 2020)

View the policy document
Reviewed under framework: No - insufficient evidence
Key findings: Insufficient evidence to review

This policy aims to establish provisions for the control of air, water, and land pollution; noise; licences and industrial plant works; environmental pollution; and greenhouse gas by establishing a licensing scheme for the importation, manufacture, and sales of hazardous substances, and the requirement for impact analysis at sites where hazardous substances are handled. The Amendments under the Environmental Protection and Management Act 1999 (EPMA) on the control of five hazardous chemicals were implemented on March 1, 2023. These two amendments included three chemicals used in plastics: dechlorane plus, UV-328 and nonylphenol. The primary driver for this policy was political, the amendment further implements Singapore’s obligations under the Stockholm Convention and Rotterdam Convention by adding the 5 substances previously mentioned (“Global environmental and chemical regulations, policies, and standards environmental protection and management act 1999”, n.d.). As highlighted in part 2, the Director-General for Environmental Protection (DGEP), who is leading the Environmental Protection Division (EPD) of the National Environment Agency, is responsible for the administration of this Act. There was insufficient evidence available to complete the evaluation framework at the time of the assessment as the amendments are too recent. However, it can be speculated that some reduction in plastics containing any of the aforementioned chemical additives should be reported since any person or business who imports, owns for sale, or sells those chemicals is required to obtain a licence under the amendments (Tuvsud, 2018; Envilliance ASIA by EnviX, n.d.).

(Uploaded in August 2023)

Year:

  • 2020

Instrument type:

Voluntary or legally binding:

Scale:

Implementation context:

Point in plastic cycle:

Policy Type:

Help us to refine our reports

We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!

Get in touch

Our methods

Through an analytical framework, we've reviewed over 100 plastic policies. These reviews determine the effectiveness of policies in reducing plastic pollution and we offer recommendations in light of this evidence, to enhance future policy making. You can find out more about our methods on our methods page.

Methods

Guidance

In light of our findings, we've created targeted guidance for Policy Makers, Citizens and Businesses.

Think we've missed something?

We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!

Submit a policy or evidence