Global Plastic Policy Reviews

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

When referring to any of the results of our analysis and/or its concept and design, please cite us accordingly:
Global Plastics Policy Centre (2022) March A., Salam, S., Evans, T., Hilton, J., Fletcher, S. (editors). Global Plastics Policy Review. Revolution Plastics Institute, University of Portsmouth.

Kenya The 2019/20 national budget statement (incentives for plastic recycling)

View the policy document
Contribution to reducing plastic pollution:
Effectiveness of meeting own objectives:
Strength of evidence: Limited Available Evidence
Reviewed under framework: Yes

This policy aimed to exempt all services offered to plastic recycling plants and supply of machinery and equipment used in the construction of these plants from Value Added Tax (VAT). It also aimed to further encourage investment in plastic recycling by lowering corporation tax to 15% for the first five years for any investor operating a plastic recycling plant (The National Treasury and Planning, n.d.).

Progress has likely been made towards meeting some objectives, but since no indicators to monitor the policy were provided, it is not possible to assess the full extent of the effects of this policy. According to the United Nations Environmental Organization, Kenya still does not have enough incentives that promote recycling and improved waste management (Akinyi, 2021). Research indicates that Kenya would likely benefit from waste management sensitization by government and non-governmental organisations and that its national government need to be encouraged to establish legal frameworks and take actions that will incentivize people, organisations and companies on the need to invest largely in the waste recovery and recycling industry (Akinyi, 2021).

This policy has had some effect on reducing plastic pollution. However the quantities of recycled plastic in Kenya still remain low (Solitei & Skanda, 2022; Okolla, 2022). In addition, some organisations believe that promoting plastic recycling is more likely to increase plastic pollution than eliminating it (Solitei & Skanda, 2022; Okolla, 2022).

(Reviewed in Mar 2023)

Year:

  • 2019

Instrument type:

Voluntary or legally binding:

Scale:

Implementation context:

Point in plastic cycle:

Policy Type:

Help us to refine our reports

We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!

Get in touch

Our methods

Through an analytical framework, we've reviewed over 100 plastic policies. These reviews determine the effectiveness of policies in reducing plastic pollution and we offer recommendations in light of this evidence, to enhance future policy making. You can find out more about our methods on our methods page.

Methods

Guidance

In light of our findings, we've created targeted guidance for Policy Makers, Citizens and Businesses.

Think we've missed something?

We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!

Submit a policy or evidence