Global Plastic Policy Reviews

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

When referring to any of the results of our analysis and/or its concept and design, please cite us accordingly:
Global Plastics Policy Centre (2022) March A., Salam, S., Evans, T., Hilton, J., Fletcher, S. (editors). Global Plastics Policy Review. Revolution Plastics Institute, University of Portsmouth.

Greenpeace Philippines, Dead Whale Campaign

View the policy document
Contribution to reducing plastic pollution:
Effectiveness of meeting own objectives:
Strength of evidence: Moderate Available Evidence
Reviewed under framework: Yes

Key Findings

View the policy document

The Dead Whale campaign was an art exhibition of a whale which had died due to ingested plastic. Created from reclaimed and recycled ocean plastic, Greenpeace Philippines hoped that this installation would encourage the public to take action and refuse plastic, and to influence leaders attending a summit of the Association of SouthEast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (Cresta, 2018). The viral effect both online and in traditional print media spurred conversation about the marine life of the Philippines and the worsening case of plastic pollution. In a span of 24 hours, an online petition gained 3,000 signatures (Furman, 2017).

(Reviewed in Jan 2022)

Year:

  • 2017

Instrument type:

Voluntary or legally binding:

Scale:

Implementation context:

Point in plastic cycle:

Policy Type:

Help us to refine our reports

We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!

Get in touch

Our methods

Through an analytical framework, we've reviewed over 100 plastic policies. These reviews determine the effectiveness of policies in reducing plastic pollution and we offer recommendations in light of this evidence, to enhance future policy making. You can find out more about our methods on our methods page.

Methods

Guidance

In light of our findings, we've created targeted guidance for Policy Makers, Citizens and Businesses.

Think we've missed something?

We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!

Submit a policy or evidence