When referring to any of the results of our analysis and/or its concept and design, please cite us accordingly:
Global Plastics Policy Centre (2022) March A., Salam, S., Evans, T., Hilton, J., Fletcher, S. (editors). Global Plastics Policy Review. Revolution Plastics, University of Portsmouth.
Canada-wide Action Plan For Extended Producer Responsibility
View the policy documentKey Findings
View the policy documentThis is an EPR based policy implemented at a provincial level. Therefore the scheme has been set up differently across the country which can generate high variation and low coherency (McRobert et al, 2019). This fragmented approach, with responsibility left to municipalities, has led to inconsistent regulations and varying degrees of producer funding, while many municipalities are already financially constrained (McRobert et al, 2019). The evidence suggests that there has been little reduction in plastic packaging debris in areas where EPR has been developed and minimum recyclable content has not necessarily increased as intended (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2014; EPR Canada, 2012; Harris et al., 2021).
(Reviewed in Mar 2023)
Our methods
Through an analytical framework, we've reviewed over 100 plastic policies. These reviews determine the effectiveness of policies in reducing plastic pollution and we offer recommendations in light of this evidence, to enhance future policy making. You can find out more about our methods on our methods page.
MethodsGuidance
In light of our findings, we've created targeted guidance for Policy Makers, Citizens and Businesses.
Think we've missed something?
We are confident in our research, however, not all evidence is made publicly available which may affect the outcome of the reviews. Let us know if you have research or evidence that can contribute to our analysis, or a policy you think would be valuable to review!
Submit a policy or evidence